A Question for creation scientists and believers in the young earth version of creation? - young model search
What technological advances have led to the creation of science, how has our life in the mainstream scientific way and improve such as mining companies for oil and minerals on the geological model for the young earth instead of integration of geological science and how successful they were ? Geology integration of countries in the world is 4.5 billion years and has hundreds of billions of dollars from the World Mining filled per year. Why can not large mining companies creationist geologist for oil and metals, which drive the global economy?
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Young Model Search A Question For Creation Scientists And Believers In The Young Earth Version Of Creation?
10 comments:
In reality, the old earth naturalism unused technology, medicine and agriculture, for all practical positive effect ... some negative effects of racism and social Darwinism. Compellign There are no data, but the humanistic philosophy that animates exclude God as acting in history, even before considering the data .... not very fair .. a bit like stacking the jury and the trial, after the inevitable conclusion
Mining peole consult with Austin as creationists creationist theories about the origin of coal, and those that simulate the movement of plates the Baumgarten-use software simulation of the movements of the plates with different boundary conditions.
NASA has a few surprises, like the magnetic fields had expected small gas giants, because they envisage years old, but the magnetic fields of giant planets radiate more heat, which she, as planned Humphreys created by a scientist. People always have and continue to water vessels of similar proportions when Noah built fortroyer, oil, etc. .. Dice not the size of the Ark of Gilgamesh, as it rolled to the ocean as a volleyball (Borg sorry)
In reality, the old earth naturalism unused technology, medicine and agriculture, for all practical positive effect ... some negative effects of racism and social Darwinism. Compellign There are no data, but the humanistic philosophy that animates exclude God as acting in history, even before considering the data .... not very fair .. a bit like stacking the jury and the trial, after the inevitable conclusion
Mining peole consult with Austin as creationists creationist theories about the origin of coal, and those that simulate the movement of plates the Baumgarten-use software simulation of the movements of the plates with different boundary conditions.
NASA has a few surprises, like the magnetic fields had expected small gas giants, because they envisage years old, but the magnetic fields of giant planets radiate more heat, which she, as planned Humphreys created by a scientist. People always have and continue to water vessels of similar proportions when Noah built fortroyer, oil, etc. .. Dice not the size of the Ark of Gilgamesh, as it rolled to the ocean as a volleyball (Borg sorry)
Creation science has contributed nothing to our society, it is not even the support, with the exception of unresolved issues in the field of geology, evolution, etc. Address
For an answer earlier that only 55% of scientists and development support, I saw a recent poll says that the United States in second place (behind Turkey, which all things) in the percentage of people in creation Science believe:
"Shows how the U.S. compared to other countries in terms of believing in evolution? Not so hot. A study of attitudes in 34 countries, in science in 2006, that have the United States in the latest developments of the popular assumption published, with the exception of Turkey. Nearly 40 percent of Americans in this study flatly rejected evolution, whereas the comparable figures were in European countries and Japan, 7 to 15 percent. This may be partly the sad American school mathematics and science achievement in comparison reflects to other developed countries, has an intrinsic truth: I think the more you know, is less taken on faith. "- Cecil Adams of Straight Dope " column.
Since the oil companies know how to use the geological and believe in evolution does not mean that evolution is correct. This means that the companies know how to use this data to find oil, how it got there.
The earth was young, the earth, but now old. I do not care companies on the geological aspect of the "religious" beliefs of the people, their education.
Well, if you use plan for the creation of scientists around the world for everything to submission, I think it's fair to say that a failure would be. These are people who believe that after all have an American Bison was escaped a trip of several thousand miles across the sea to a flood of a man in the middle of the desert, if we believe in the Bible.
AD
Not only are the engineering companies in Germany have been using the principles of evolution to a more efficient trains to be developed. how many of them have ever been a farm.
There can be many.
This version of creationism is absurd.
God is not misleading. N eath would have looked billions of years, because he can.
God is truth. Science seeks the truth. I trust them.
This version of creationism is absurd.
God is not misleading. N eath would have looked billions of years, because he can.
God is truth. Science seeks the truth. I trust them.
The scientific body scattered in all fields of science. The last poll I saw about 10 years ago, said that about 55% of scientists believe in Darwinian evolution and geological age. I think they assume that the scientific establishment are few, and all piled up somewhere. That is not true.
Post a Comment